When this is the right call
These are the sentences that usually precede the enquiry:
- A junior analyst or engineer is making decisions well above their pay grade, alone.
- Vendor proposals arrive and nobody internally can evaluate them.
- The roadmap is a list of requests rather than a plan.
- Hiring is stalled because nobody knows what role to open first.
What is different afterwards
- A data roadmap tied to business priorities, reviewed on a fixed cadence.
- Architecture and vendor decisions made deliberately, with the reasoning recorded.
- Your existing team supported, reviewed and developed rather than replaced.
- A clear path to the point where the role is no longer needed.
What you receive
- Standing weekly time with the team, plus availability for decisions in between.
- Quarterly roadmap and its review against what actually happened.
- Architecture and technical decision records.
- Code and design review for the team.
- Hiring support: role definition, technical screening and interview design.
How it runs
- AssessThe current state of the platform, the team and the demand on them, in the first few weeks.
- Set directionA roadmap the business has agreed to, with the trade-offs stated plainly.
- Run the cadenceWeekly team time, decision reviews and a monthly written update to whoever owns the budget.
- Build the teamDevelop the people you have and hire deliberately into the gaps that remain.
- Hand overThe role exists to become unnecessary. The exit condition is agreed at the start, not improvised later.
Who this suits
- Companies with one to five people doing data and nobody senior leading them.
- Founders who need to make a platform decision they cannot yet evaluate.
- Teams between heads of data who need continuity.
Engagement: Monthly retainer, typically one to two days a week, with a defined review point.